The ceiling inside the dome of the U.S. Capitol

Category: Archive Page 8 of 9

Devils in DC: Don Taylor & Fuqua’s Health Sector Management Program

Students and faculty in Fuqua’s Health Sector Management Program (HSM) traveled to DC last week as part of the program’s annual Week in DC (WIDC).  The WIDC course, HLTHMGMT716: Health Systems and Policy, brings daytime MBA, executive MBA, and MPP students to Washington to learn about health policy from members of Congress, agency officials, think tank fellows, and other senior health policy practitioners working on the front lines of health care policy.
The week-long program included a packed schedule of back-to-back speakers, and we spoke to HSM and Sanford School of Public Policy professor Don Taylor via Twitter on the heels of their visit last week:

@DukeFedRel:   What were you here to accomplish in DC this week?
@donaldhtaylorjr: Goal of week in DC was to expose students to the way politics and policy impacts the health sector

@DukeFedRel:
 What were some of the highlights?
@donaldhtaylorjr: Meeting w top officials in CMS, w Senator Burr& Rep Butterfield, & VP govt relations of Fortune 500 firm
@donaldhtaylorjr: The students were very engaged and Fuqua staff Simeon Furman and Kate Miller did incredible job w logistics
@donaldhtaylorjr: Thanks to Chris Simmons + Alyssa Dack with scheduling

@DukeFedRel: Learn anything new or surprising from these in-person meetings?
@donaldhtaylorjr: The degree to which the private sector says there is no going back re health reform. The question is what next?

@DukeFedRel: What IS next? Good luck writing that in 140 characters.
@donaldhtaylorjr: A political deal is inevitable. Question is when do political winds line up for technical tweaks. Post 2014
@donaldhtaylorjr: Biggest biz oppty is intervening in the lives of vulnerable to avoid hospital. Low tech, low cost, quicker sink or swim

@DukeFedRel: Will the trip impact your own research or teaching?
@donaldhtaylorjr: Trip reinforced that my research focus on hospice/palliative care is where my focus belongs; been value focused for long time

@DukeFedRel: And what impact do you think the week had on the students?
@donaldhtaylorjr: Greater appreciation that politics and policy impact business; truncates what is possible

@DukeFedRel: You met with practitioners on both sides of the aisle and representing different perspectives. Any evidence of way forward?
@donaldhtaylorjr: In off the record discussions there is more overlap between Ds & Rs than appears in many public statements. Key is when do politics allow it

@DukeFedRel: Well here’s hoping some progress will be made by next year’s WIDC. Thanks for speaking with us!
@donaldhtaylorjr: You are welcome

New Year, New Article: OFR in the Raleigh News & Observer

The first day of 2014 was a good news day for the Office of Federal Relations.  We woke up to a nice profile highlighting OFR and our efforts to advocate for policies that are good for Duke faculty, students, and staff.  Our colleagues from that other school down the road got some nice press too.

Check it out!

Duke, UNC Keep a Sharp Eye on Washington

Spotlight on Duke in Washington: The Deep Sea

The Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions recently hosted their first Washington Forum on emerging issues in deep-sea policy. The event brought a panel of experts to the Duke in Washington office to discuss everything from the history behind the United States’ involvement in deep sea mineral exploration to international governance challenges involving the ocean.

Below, Linwood Pendleton, director of the Ocean and Coastal Policy Program at the Nicholas Institute, talks about the gathering.

DiW: For those that are unaware, what are the major emerging issues in deep sea governance?

LP: Interest in exploiting deep sea resources is growing and conservation organizations are trying to keep up. New technologies have opened up the deep sea bed to mining. The first deep sea mine will  likely go into production off the coast of Papua New Guinea within the next few years. Such a mine would offer a new source for copper, manganese, gold, and rare earth minerals, which are necessary for modern devices including smart phones and laptops.

In addition to mining, we see increased industrial trawling for fish in the deep sea, and more and more deep sea oil and gas extraction. At the present, our limited knowledge of deep sea ecosystems makes it difficult to weigh the potential biological and environmental impacts of industrial activity there. We need to figure out how to take advantage of the non-living resources of the deep in a way that ensures environmental costs are minimized and never greater than the benefits of these activities.

DiW: Oceans play a significant role in the nation’s economy. What do we really stand to lose by not looking for ways to solve these issues?

LP: Ocean ecosystems contribute directly to the economy through the provision of fish, recreational opportunities, carbon sequestration, and oxygen production—just to name a few of the benefits we get from the living sea. The deep sea bed is an integral part of ocean ecosystems. Activities that degrade the deep sea potentially put these ecosystem services at risk.

DiW: Can you tell us about the top two theme or outcomes to come out of your recent Washington Forum?

LP: I think many in the audience were surprised at how much activity is happening within the deep sea areas of the United States Exclusive Economic Zone. Marine Sanctuaries now protect extremely deep parts of the ocean, including the Mariana’s trench. The National Marine Fisheries Service has declared deep sea corals to be essential fish habitat.

The NOAA office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research is actively involved in surveying the deep sea, especially to determine the limits of our outer continental shelf—the boundary at which the very deep sea begins. Several of our panelists also noted that the United States has not yet signed the Law of the Sea. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) outlines the rights and responsibilities nations have toward the world’s oceans, including guidelines for businesses, the environment, and management of natural resources. UNCLOS could be a good framework to help promote better deep sea governance, especially given that much of the deep sea exists outside of national boundaries. By not signing the convention, the ability of the United States to help shape the governance of the deep sea is limited.

DiW: How will Duke and the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions use this information in research intended to contribute to the larger conversation around these issues?

LP: The Nicholas Institute continues to work closely with our partners at the Nicholas School, especially Cindy van Dover, Pat Halpin, and James Kraska, to further the policy discussion on better ways of managing the living and non-living resources of the deep sea.

The Nicholas Institute is in a unique position to foster conversations between industries, government, scientists, and environmentalists. That was the intent of the latest Washington Forum, and others planned for the future—to keep the conversation moving in the right direction.

Event Recap: Three NC Reps Demo Federally-Funded Airport Security Research at Duke

Three members of the North Carolina delegation to Congress –  Reps. Richard Hudson (R-NC), George Holding (R-NC), and David Price (D-NC) – visited campus on November 6 to tour research labs and view demonstrations of airport security research projects happening at Duke.

Over the past several years, Duke has become a vibrant hub of research into aviation security explosives detection systems. Projects with highly technical names like “coded aperture miniature mass spectroscopy” are focusing on making an impact in our everyday lives by making technology used in airport security checkpoints smaller, faster, cheaper, and more effective.  In short, these projects aim to make us safer with, in some cases, the added potential bonus of shorter security lines – which all can agree is a laudable goal.

The visit stemmed from a Congressional briefing on these projects that OFR hosted in DC this past summer.  Intrigued by what he learned from the researchers’ presentations, Rep. Hudson, chair of the Transportation Security Subcommittee of the House Committee on Homeland Security, initiated the idea for a laboratory tour and invited some of his colleagues to join him in viewing the projects in action.

The Members’ visit also included a meeting with President Brodhead and Chancellor Dzau, who stressed the importance of ending the federal budget sequester and reaching a bipartisan solution to the current budget impasse.
Below are some photos and descriptions of the, to use a scientific term, “really cool” federally-sponsored projects that the Members checked out.
You can also read local media coverage of the visit here, here, and here.

metaImager

Imagine walking through a corridor at your normal pace and proceeding to your gate (with enough time to pick up a magazine and a candy bar), without having to suffer the boredom and indignity of the one-at-at-a-time airport checkpoint security queue.  Professor David Smith is developing technology using metamaterials that would only stop passengers if large antennae in the walls detected dangerous objects on an individual.  These metamaterials integrate three types of imaging processes that provide improved resolution and specificity in detection and result in a cost reduction of 10-20 times that of current technology to boot.

This technology will be tested for TSA and DHS in the next 1-2 years and could be in airports in as little as 3 years.

Professor David Smith demonstrates his MetaImager project to Reps. Holding and Hudson.

mmw scanner

Reps. George Holding (R-NC), Richard Hudson (R-NC), and David Price (D-NC) observe Duke researcher Daniel Marks demonstrate a non-mechanical mmw personnel scanner, part of the MetaImager project.

Gigapixel Camera

How valuable would a surveillance image that let you zoom in on the tiny neck tattoo of a person in the midst of a large crowd be?  Well the gigapixel camera is an experimental camera with a resolution 10 times that of normal human vision.  This super high-resolution allows a viewer, once the picture is taken, to zoom in on an image to a degree that makes even the tiniest details discernible.

Though the AWARE-2 project is funded by the Department of Defense, these cameras, which have obvious applications for surveillance technology, sparked some of the initial DHS interest in Duke research into aviation security.

Gigapixel

Researcher Steve Feller of the DISP lab demos the gigapixel camera for Reps. Holding, Hudson, and Price on November 6.  Photo by Les Todd

Coded Aperture Micro Mass Spectroscopy (CAMMS)

Have you ever had your hands swabbed in the airport security line?  The TSA agents are searching for trace amounts of explosives, and although it’s a relatively simple process (from a passenger point of view), the number of false positives returned from these tests are not ideal.
Enter Duke research into CAMMS. Dubbed “the ultimate chemical sensor,” the micro mass spectrometer can be used as a portable explosives sensor, and Duke researchers are developing the technology to make them low cost, sensitive, quick, and field-deployable.

181313_rep_visit002

Professor Jeff Glass demonstrates his research on trace explosive detection. Photo by Les Todd

X-Ray Scatter

Could the end of the 3oz rule be in sight? Current x-ray technology at airport checkpoints display simple outlines of the objects in your suitcase, but Duke professor David Brady is working on an airport x-ray detection system that would actually detect the exact molecular structure of a bag’s contents, allowing screeners to know exactly what kind of material you have in your briefcase.

This research also has implications for the medical field by allowing for lower dosages and focused x-rays, which would reduce the threat of overexposure to radiation.

xray scatter

Reps. Price, Holding, and Hudson observe a demonstration of the x-ray scatter technology being developed at Duke University. 

For more information on these and other federally-funded projects at Duke, please contact the Duke Office of Federal Relations.

Event Recap: Congressional State and District Staff Day

Spotted among the usual backpacks and ballcaps on campus last week were the padfolios and pantsuits of the state and district staff of the North Carolina delegation to Congress. These staffers oversee the home offices of the Senators and Representatives that represent North Carolina in the U.S. Congress, and they visited campus on October 23rd for a full day of meetings to learn more about Duke’s programs and their impacts in the state.

Held every other year and co-hosted by the university’s Office of Federal Relations and the DUHS Office of Government Relations, the event serves as a reminder that Duke is an invaluable resource for information and programs that impact the constituents and interests of each of North Carolina’s representatives to Congress.

Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations, kicked off this year’s visit by welcoming the group with anecdotes and facts about Duke and its reach in North Carolina and then turned things over to Dan Struble, associate dean for external relations at Duke University Divinity School.

“True or False, 42% of Duke Divinity graduates remain in North Carolina after graduation?” asked Struble.
“True?” hedged a staff member.
“Good guess!” sang Struble, who devoted his session to teaching the group about education and outreach initiatives of the Divinity School and how the school is uniquely positioned, both physically (the chapel is at the heart of campus after all) and intellectually (Duke Divinity is home to the Theology, Medicine, and Culture Initiative), to address complex global questions facing society today.

Next on the agenda was an optional tour of the Duke Chapel, where the participants learned about the history of the chapel, the origin of the stone used in its construction (it’s Hillsborough bluestone, btw), and the contributions of those buried in the chapel’s crypt.

The group then directed its attention to the more technical side of Duke, with a session highlighting some of the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) education research and initiatives that are making an impact on students across North Carolina and beyond.

Administrators and faculty outlined STEM-focused initiatives at Duke, from programs aimed at recruiting and retaining populations underrepresented in engineering and the sciences to state-of-the-art science education resources for K-16 teachers and their students.

Many of these programs show elementary or high school students how “science is not a silo that a group of smart people go and do ‘over there.’ It’s something that you, and you, and you do,” said Rochelle Schwartz-Bloom, director of the Duke Center for Science Education, during an enthusiastic discussion with the district staff about the Duke initiatives.
Gary Ybarra, professor of electrical and computer engineering, discussed his work sculpting TechXcite, a curriculum for after-school programs that aims to strengthen interest in and understanding of engineering topics for 11 to 14-year-olds.  The initiative, a partnership between the Pratt School of Engineering and 4-H, goes way beyond the agricultural programs for which 4-H is traditionally known.

After much lively discussion showcasing the STEM initiatives, the group moved on to lunch, where they were joined by student veterans who are currently pursuing Duke degrees with the support of VA education benefits.

The number of undergraduate, graduate and professional students at Duke receiving benefits like the Post-9/11 GI Bill has increased by 451 percent in the last four years — from 35 in 2009 to 158 today. In fact, this group is Duke’s fastest growing student population, and the students attending the lunch spent their time talking about their studies, their reasons for choosing Duke, their military experiences, and, of course, their future plans.

The state and district staff then headed over to Duke Medical Center to meet the DUHS government relations team, who filled the remainder of the day with facilities tours and sessions about resources like community cancer programs and constituent-patient services.

Congressional State and District Staff Day takes a lot of legwork and cooperation among our colleagues on campus to execute successfully, and, as usual, OFR is indebted to all who participated to make the day so substantive and engaging.  And, above all, we appreciate the state and district staff for dedicating an entire day’s work to learning more about Duke and all that it does to benefit North Carolina and our nation as a whole.

Scholar Profile: Jentleson on the Integration of Policy and Academia

Today’s Talker: Bruce Jentleson, Professor of Public Policy and Political Science

As a two-time State Department official, Bruce Jentleson has been a  fixture around the nation’s capitol for over a decade. But on one recent Friday afternoon, Washington, DC, was just another stop in a busy fall – one that includes teaching two classes on campus, developing a MOOC which started Oct. 20, promoting the most recent edition of his textbook, and addressing numerous media requests.  What brought this foreign-policy expert into the Duke in Washington office? Read on to find out:

DiW: What was on your schedule today?

Jentleson:  A meeting with State Department contractors, so I could participate in a utility analysis of the ongoing Syrian conflict. In the exercise, I was evaluating possible strategies for successful diplomacy to provide a resolution and government transition. I identified stakeholders – whether they were internal, regional, or global – and analyzed their negotiating position.

DiW: Sounds like quite the exercise. Why did the group ask you in particular to participate in this analysis?

Jentleson: Because of my career experiences, I have the ability to take scholarly knowledge and apply it to practical and specific policy. It’s different than someone who’s just been in an academic setting – I have an integrated sense of how the policy and academic worlds interact.

DiW: It’s clear you’ve made a conscious decision to engage in both the policy and academic worlds. Why is that? Why keep up this pace?

Jentleson: Because I enjoy what I do. I like everything about being a professor and I’ve always believed in the benefits in linking the academic and policy worlds. My academic training gives me a distinct perspective on things like public opinion. I see things numbers not just as polls but as larger patterns. And being engaged in policy makes me a better teacher, a better professor.

Federal Government Shutdown: Information for the Duke Community

UPDATE: posted Monday, Oct. 21

Agencies release guidance for resumption of service, grant application submissionsAs the federal government resumes normal operations, individual agencies have begun to release guidance for the grant application, review, and award activities that were impacted by the government shutdown. Below are links to those agencies with direct impact upon the Duke community:

National Institutes of Health:

The NIH has moved all submission deadlines that were intended to take place in October to November dates to allow applicants access to the resources and support of NIH staff. November deadlines will not change.

The Electronic Research Administration (eRA) website is now operable. Further information on how the NIH will resume operations, reschedule meetings and reviews, and prioritize tasks is available here.

National Science Foundation:

The NSF FastLane is now available for proposal preparation and submission. Applicants, peer reviews, and current award recipients may resume normal operations of submission, uploading reviews, and drawing down funds using the NSF web portals. The NSF will provide revised due dates for funding opportunities that had a submission date between Oct. 1 and 25, 2013. They have also announced delays for the posting of new funding opportunities, review of submissions, and responding to inquiries.

Further official guidance from the NSF is available here.

UPDATE: posted Thursday, Oct. 17

President signs Continuing Resolution, Federal Government begins process of reopening

President Barak Obama has now signed a continuing resolution that brings federal employees back to work and reopens many government functions. Federal employees were directed to report to their offices for normal hours beginning Thursday, Oct. 17.

The Office of Management and Budget has instructed employees to reopen their offices in a prompt and orderly manner; however, please bear in mind that employees will need time to respond to all emails, phone messages, and other requests they have received during the 16 day shutdown.

Members of OFR will continue to monitor the situation as the government returns to normal operations.

UPDATE
Message re: Current Status of Extramural Operations at NIH — posted 10/15/13 at 10:30am

Please see below note from NIH’s deputy director for extramural research.  Additional guidance from NIH advises that applicants are strongly encouraged not to submit paper or electronic grant applications to NIH during the period of the lapse.

TO:  NIH Extramural Community

This is a brief communication to update the biomedical research community of the current status of extramural operations at NIH. The NIH continues to be shut down for all non-excepted activities. This means that the vast majority of NIH staff that oversee program, review, and grants management are furloughed, NIH grants and contract submissions are not being processed, reviews are not occurring, and no awards are being made. As described in NOT-OD-13-126, the Payment Management Systems remains operational and funds for most grants awarded before the shutdown can continue to be drawn down.

As the shutdown drags on, the challenge of reestablishing normal operations quickly is growing. Once the shutdown is over, NIH will need time to set new dates for grant and contract submissions, review meetings, conferences, and other activities that were scheduled to happen during and immediately following the period of the shutdown. It will take us a few days after this is over to communicate our plans, so please bear with us.

You can find the current guidance posted at grants.nih.gov. Once we reopen, additional information will be posted and published in the NIH Guide as quickly as we can make it available.

All of us at NIH hope the current situation is resolved soon, but we don’t know when that will be.

We appreciate your patience as we go through this difficult experience together.

Sincerely,
Sally Rockey, Ph.D.
NIH Deputy Director for Extramural Research

UPDATE
Appearances by Federal Officials CANCELED — posted

0/2/13 at 1:30pm:
Two events, featuring keynotes by federal officials, have been canceled due to the federal government shutdown.

The Gulf Study: Investigating the Human Health Effects of the BP/Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, featuring Richard Kwok of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, has been postponed to Spring 2014. The event was scheduled for lunchtime on Oct. 3, hosted by the Duke Global Health Institute.

Energy Security in an Era of Climate Change, featuring Daniel Poneman, the Deputy Secretary of Energy, was postponed until after the government resumes normal functions. He was to kick off the Energy Speaker Series on Tuesday, Oct. 1.

UPDATE
Status of Duke – Navy Football Game — posted 10/1/13 at 5:30pm:

The Service Academies (Navy, Air Force, Army) will make decisions on the status of athletic competitions scheduled for Saturday, Oct. 12, including the Duke – Navy game, late next week. At this time, Duke athletics is operating under the assumption that this game will take place as planned at 12:30pm on Saturday, Oct. 12. We will provide further updates as they are available.

UPDATE
Federal Government Enters Shutdown Mode — posted 10/1/13 at 9:30am:

As midnight on Oct. 1 approached and Congress had yet to reach an agreement over funding the federal government, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) sent notice to all federal agencies instructing them to begin executing their contingency plans.  Below are updates from those agencies whose operations have a direct impact on the Duke community.

Department of Education:
There will be minimal impact on schools, lenders, and guaranty agencies and their ability to administer the Title IV Programs, which include federal student loan programs. Activities related to the disbursement of Pell grants and other Direct Federal Student Loan programs will continue, and staff and contractors associated with these programs could continue to work as well.

Additionally:
–          Most customer service contact centers will remain open.
–          The eCampus-Based (eCB) Web site will remain operational and FISAPS can be submitted,
although the filing deadline will be extended because the call center will be closed.
–          FAFSA on the Web and most other processing sites will be operational.

Department of Energy:

Staff supporting the Advanced Energy Research Projects – Energy (ARPA-E) are not essential to the safety of human life or the protection of property and therefore will not report to work through a government shutdown. Only funds currently obligated to contractors and available for current fiscal year operations. No new awards will be permitted.

National Institutes of Health:

The Payment Management System will remain operational. This means individuals who are currently receiving grant funds from HHS departments will be able to drawdown their funds. However, please be aware that HHS administrative staff will not be available to provide routine services.

In addition, the www.grants.gov website will remain operational. Individuals will be able to submit grant applications; however, these will not be processed until the government resumes normal operations.

National Endowment for the Humanities:

During a shutdown, NEH’s core functions will be halted, including application processing and review, grant oversight and payments, staff travel, staff training, and procurement activities.

Grants.gov, mentioned above, also processes applications to the NEH and will continue to function. Individuals will be able to submit applications; however, technical and administrative support will not be available, unless the question may be answered by excepted employee from the Office of Information Resources Management.  No help desk or contact support for grantees will be available.

National Science Foundation:

Individuals with grant funding through the National Science Foundation should expect a direct message with information regarding access to funds. The NSF has indicated that work may continue on these projects to the extent that doing so will not require federal staff intervention and that funds are available. The NSF will not distribute funds through the shutdown.

Department of Defense:

On Monday night, President Obama signed a measure that continues funding for those contractors whom Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel determines “are providing support to the Armed Forces.” The Defense Department has not yet indicated how broadly Secretary Hagel will apply this authority.

General Notes:

If you have meetings scheduled with federal officials in the coming days and weeks, please call ahead to determine the operational status of the office.

OFR will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates to the Duke community as further information becomes available.
Below are direct links to agency communications.

Read More:

Department of Education (ed.gov)
Department of Energy (energy.gov)
Department of Health and Human Services (hhs.gov)
National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH.gov)
National Science Foundation (nsf.gov)

Original post dated 9/26/13:
The following memo was sent to Duke deans, department heads, managers and others from Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations.  OFR will continue to provide updates as they become available.

The Office of Federal Relations is closely monitoring the budget negotiations in Washington to determine the implications of a possible federal government shutdown on Duke and its activities.  If such a shutdown takes place, it will begin next Tuesday, October 1.

The Office of Management and Budget has instructed all federal agencies and congressional offices to prepare contingency plans for internal use.

At this time, OMB has not provided guidance on communicating these plans to non-governmental employees, so it is unclear what the potential impact of a lapse in government activities will be on the Duke community.

Our Federal Relations team in Durham and Washington, DC, will continue to watch for further developments and communications from the federal agencies, but it is possible that official guidance will not become available until after the shutdown takes place. As information is received, we will share it with members of the Duke community through Duke Today. In the meantime, if you have meetings or events planned with federal officials during the next few weeks or have time-sensitive business (i.e. deadlines), it is recommended that contingency plans be considered before the close of business on Monday, September 30.
Attached are two publications from OMB and the Congressional Research Service (CRS) regarding federal government shutdowns for your reference.

Read More:
Shutdown of the Federal Government: Causes, Processes, and Effects (CRS)
Section 124 – Agency Operations in the Absence of Appropriations (OMB)

Related:
Higher Education Braces for Government Shutdown and More Fiscal Fights (Inside Higher Ed)

Spotlight on Duke in Washington: Ecosystems Forum Hosts Federal Stakeholders

Recently spotted in and around the Duke in Washington office were members of the National Ecosystems Services Partnership (NESP), an initiative of Duke’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. On their schedule were meetings for its Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services (FRMES) project, which seeks to provide guidance to federal agencies on how to plan and manage ecosystem services. These meetings served as a forum for sharing research and reports between Duke staff and federal stakeholders.

Below, Lydia Olander, Director of the NESP, talks about the goals and practical applications of the FRMES project.

DiW: Tell us a little about the Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services project and what you hope to accomplish through it?

LO: The FRMES project is designed to do two things:

  • Bring together a cross-agency community to share ideas and build a consistent understanding and use of ecosystem services in the context of federal resource management and planning.
  • Develop a guidebook for agencies that explores how ecosystem services can be used, given agency legal authorities and mandates, common decision processes, and current planning and management assessment methods.  The guidebook will consider the contexts within which different agencies would be applying ecosystem services frameworks, including a series of case studies from a number of agency partners.  It also will contain a technical element: methods for conducting ecosystem services assessments and guidance on a common framework for quantifying ecosystem services and evaluating trade-offs.

DiW: How do these initial meetings contribute to the bigger conversation on ecosystem services?

LO: There is deep interest in the concept of ecosystem services across many federal resource agencies as well as at the executive level, especially with respect to how it could improve decision making and help agencies better manage public land and water resources.  Although it draws on concepts and research that agencies and academics have been developing for many years, ecosystem services is a new enterprise in many respects.

Both methods and perceptions among resource managers, academics, and federal decision makers continue to evolve. By working with agencies and outside experts through the FRMES project and especially in meetings such as the one held recently in Washington, D.C., this project will develop the credible, consistent methods and community of engaged practitioners necessary to advance agencies’ integration of ecosystem services approaches into their resource planning and decision making.

While our project is focused on informing planning processes in agencies that manage public lands and waters, there are a broader suite of applications. For example, the framework, methods, and examples explored in the guidebook could inform air and water quality rule makings or large-scale restoration efforts, such as those being developed in response to Hurricane Sandy.

Devils in DC: Duke Officials Talk Student Loans

The federal government is closed for business this week.  However, when the shutdown was still just a possibility, Duke administrators shared the needs of Duke students with Congressional staff in preparation for upcoming legislative business.

Donna Lisker, associate vice provost for undergraduate education, and Alison Rabil, assistant vice provost and director of financial aid, traveled to Washington on September 23 to discuss higher education issues with staff from three North Carolina delegation offices.

The two used their time with congressional staff from the offices of Senator Richard Burr, Senator Kay Hagan, and Representative Virginia Foxx to discuss President Obama’s higher education proposal, concerns regarding the upcoming Higher Education Act (HEA) reauthorization, and Duke’s desire to serve as a resource for information and policy ideas.
Why did these two travel all the way to DC to share their views?  Watch the video to find out:

Brodhead Pumps up the Humanities with a Colbert Fistbump

President Brodhead, co-chair of the Commission on Humanities and Social Sciences, appeared on Colbert Nation to talk the importance of the humanities, as outlined in the Commission’s new report, The Heart of the Matter.

Read the Duke Today coverage here.

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes, Video Archive

Page 8 of 9

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén